典型工程场地台风剖面及台风作用下结构气动阻尼研究
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

(1. 浙江金华甬金高速公路有限公司 杭州科技分公司,浙江 杭州 310000; 2. 浙江舟山跨海大桥有限公司,浙江 舟山 316000; 3. 同济大学 土木工程防灾减灾国家重点实验室,上海 200092; 4. 同济大学桥梁结构抗风技术交通行业重点实验室,上海 200092)

作者简介:

通讯作者:

崔巍(1988—),男,助理教授,主要从事结构风工程方面的研究工作。E-mail: cuiwei@tongji.edu.cn

中图分类号:

P425、U447

基金项目:

舟山连岛西堠门跨海大桥风环境与结构风效应预警与防控研究(202208)


Typhoon wind profile and structural aerodynamic damping under action of typhoon at typical engineering sites
Author:
Affiliation:

(1. Hangzhou Technology Branch,Zhejiang Jinhua Yongjin Expressway Co., Ltd. , Hangzhou 310000, China;2. Zhejiang Zhoushan Cross-sea Bridge Co., Ltd., Zhoushan 316000, China; 3. State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 4. Key Laboratory of Transport Industry of Wind Resistant Technology for Bridge Structures,Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    台风是影响我国沿海地区大跨度、高耸结构安全的关键荷载,台风风剖面与常规良态风风剖面存在显著差异,准确评估台风设计风剖面对于指导沿海结构的抗风设计具有至关重要的意义。基于此,选取了国内外8种主要的规范和标准设计开阔地貌的风剖面,并将其与实测台风风剖面进行对比,发现现行规范在描述台风风剖面时,难以充分反映其随高度和空间位置的变化特征。针对这一不足,提出了三种台风设计风剖面的方法,分别是:1.基于规范建议设计风剖面;2.设计不同高度相同重现期的组合风剖面;3.设计基于特定高度及重现期的真实风剖面,其中方法2和方法3考虑了台风剖面随高度的变化特征。研究结果表明,方法2和3所得的风剖面均大于规范风剖面,方法2获得的风剖面与方法3的平均风剖面较为接近,但方法2获得的风剖面在真实台风中可能并不存在,且方法3有接近一半的真实风剖面高于方法2的结果。进一步分析表明,现行规范中推荐的风剖面可能低估了台风实际风剖面的强度。同时,仅基于不同高度处100年重现期的风剖面也无法全面地反映台风的真实风剖面特性。因此,在考虑风对建筑物的静力响应时,建议采用方法3所得的风剖面作为台风设计风剖面,以确保结构的安全性和可靠性。

    Abstract:

    Typhoon is a key load influencing the safety of large-span and tall structures in the coastal areas of China. There is a great difference between typhoon wind profile and normal wind profile. Accurate estimation of design wind profile of a typhoon is very important to guide the wind resistance design of coastal structures. In this paper, the wind profiles of 8 major standards and specifications on open landforms at home and abroad are selected to compare with the measured typhoon profiles. The current specifications are difficult to reflect the variation characteristics of typhoon profiles with height and do not include the evolution of typhoon profiles with spatial location. In response to this, the paper proposes three methods for design wind profile of typhoons:1. design of wind profile based on the specification;2. design of combined wind profile based on the same recurrence period at different heights;3. design of the real wind profile based on the wind speed in the recurrence period at specific heights. Method 2 and 3 consider the characteristics of the typhoon wind profile changing with height. The calculated results show that the wind profiles obtained by method 2 and 3 are greater than the standard profile, and the profile obtained by method 2 is close to the mean profile obtained by method 3, but the profile obtained by method 2 may not exist in real typhoons. Nearly half of the real wind profile obtained by method 3 is higher than the result of method 2. The wind profile recommended in the current specification may be the result of underestimating the strength of actual wind profile of typhoons, and the wind profile based on the 100-year recurrence period at different heights cannot comprehensively reflect the real profile characteristics of typhoons. If only the static response of wind to buildings is considered, it is recommended to adopt the design wind profile of typhoons based on method 3 to ensure safety and reliability of structures.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

吴向阳,官华,徐祖恩,等.典型工程场地台风剖面及台风作用下结构气动阻尼研究[J].交通科学与工程,2024,40(6):93-101.
WU Xiangyang, GUAN Hua, XU Zuen, et al. Typhoon wind profile and structural aerodynamic damping under action of typhoon at typical engineering sites[J]. Journal of Transport Science and Engineering,2024,40(6):93-101.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-12
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-12-24
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码