基于数据驱动的长周期加速加载沥青路面三阶段车辙预估研究
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.长沙理工大学 交通运输工程学院;2.交通运输部公路科学研究院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(52278437,52478442),湖南省交通运输厅科技进步与创新计划项目(202236),长沙理工大学道路灾变防治及交通安全教育部工程研究中心开放基金项目(kfj210401)


Study on data-driven three-stage rutting prediction for asphalt pavement under long-cycle accelerated loading
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

National Natural Science Foundation of China (52278437, 52478442), Innovation Program of Department of Transport of Hunan Province (202236),Open Fund of Engineering Research Center of Catastrophic Prophylaxis and Treatment of Road & Traffic Safety of Ministry of Education (Changsha University of Science & Technology) (kfj210401).

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    【目的】为了改进我国现有规范中车辙模型采用单一函数进行预测,从而导致的预估精度不高、适用性不强的问题,基于足尺路面结构长期性能检测的车辙数据,提出数据驱动的沥青路面三阶段车辙模型并利用MATLAB开发了模型算法。【方法】该预估模型的建立和验证使用了包含半刚性基层沥青路面、刚性基层沥青路面、柔性基层沥青路面和全厚式沥青路面四种沥青路面结构,基于7000万次等效加载的车辙数据,并与我国公路沥青路面设计规范和美国MEPDG方法的车辙模型进行比较研究。【结果】不同路面结构组合的沥青路面车辙量及发展过程存在较大差异,三阶段车辙模型能够比较准确地表征各类沥青路面结构车辙发展的全阶段,开发的模型算法能够实现对车辙发展过程的智能判断及自动拟合,预估效果良好;MEPDG车辙模型对发展中后期的车辙预估效果不佳,D50车辙模型则对于刚性基层沥青路面和全厚式沥青路面结构的适用性较差;而现有的主流车辙模型均采用以单一函数,不足以准确表征沥青路面车辙的多阶段发展规律。【结论】研究成果可以改善沥青路面车辙预估,也可以为大数据分析在沥青路面性能预测和科学维养决策中的应用提供参考。

    Abstract:

    [Purpose]To address the issue in China's current specifications whose rutting model uses a single function for prediction, leading to low estimation accuracy and poor applicability, a three-stage rutting model for asphalt pavement was proposed based on long-term rut measure data, and MATLAB was employed to develop a data-driven model algorithm. [methods]Through the accelerated loading test of full-scale pavement facility, the three-stage rutting model and its algorithm were constructed and verified by four asphalt pavement structures including semi-rigid base asphalt pavement, rigid base asphalt pavement, flexible base asphalt pavement and full-thickness asphalt pavement after 70 million equivalent loadings. The rutting models of China Specifications for Highway Design of Asphalt Pavement and the MEPDG of US were comparatively studied. [result] there are significant differences among different pavement structures, and the three-stage rutting model can accurately characterize the various stages of asphalt pavement rutting development of all four pavement structures. The developed model algorithm can realize intelligent judgment of the three-stage rutting development, and the fitting effect is good; MEPDG-2015 rutting model has a bad prediction for the middle and later stages of rutting, and the D50 rutting model has poor applicability to rigid bases asphalt pavement and full-thickness asphalt pavement structures. The existing rutting models use one single function, which is not sufficient to accurately characterize the multi-stage development of asphalt pavement rutting. [conclusion]The research results can improve the prediction of asphalt pavement rutting, and provide a reference for the application of big data analysis in asphalt pavement performance prediction and maintenance decision-making.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-08-29
  • 最后修改日期:2024-12-11
  • 录用日期:2024-12-11
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码