公路隧道二衬荷载分担比分析与安全性研究
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

广西路建集团建筑工程有限公司

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

U455???

基金项目:

南宁市科学研究与技术开发计划重点研发计划(20231045)


Load sharing ratio analysis and safety research of secondary lining of highway tunnel
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    研究公路隧道支护结构荷载分担演化规律,评估二次衬砌安全性,为施工稳定性控制提供依据。以某公路隧道为背景,基于初支与二衬现场应变监测数据,引入应变比值算荷载分担比例;分析监测断面应变时程规律与分担比例;对比二衬监测与荷载-结构模型模拟应变验证可靠性;提取不同分担比下模型内力,算安全系数反映施工稳定性。支护应变分急速(0-40 d)、缓慢至稳定(40-160 d)、稳定(160-360 d)三阶段;初支、二衬荷载分担比31%、69%;二衬实测与模拟应变趋势一致(拱脚峰值、边墙最低),误差2.4%-8.5%;二衬拱脚压力峰值、负弯矩峰值,顶部正弯矩峰值;拱脚弯矩反号,抗拉安全系数近临界值;分担比增大使轴力、弯矩增,安全系数降。隧道支护荷载分担比明确(初支31%、二衬69%),分担比增显著增二衬内力、降安全性;拱脚是受力关键与薄弱点,需重点关注;所建荷载-结构模型可靠,可用于支护力学分析与安全评估。

    Abstract:

    Taking a highway tunnel as an example, based on the monitoring data of initial support and secondary lining strain in the field, the concept of strain ratio is introduced into the load sharing ratio of the support structure. The time-course variation law of support strain and the load sharing ratio of the monitoring section are studied. The strain data of secondary lining monitoring and load-structure model are compared to verify the reliability of the simulation. The numerical results of simulated internal forces under different load sharing ratios of secondary lining are extracted to calculate the safety factor of secondary lining, which reflects the construction stability from the side. The results show that the support strain is divided into three stages: rapid development (0 d-40 d), slow development to stability (40 d-160 d), and stability (60 d-360 d). The load sharing ratios of initial support and secondary lining calculated by introducing strain ratio are 31% and 69% respectively. The actual strain of secondary lining is consistent with the simulation trend. The peak value and the minimum value are located at the arch foot and side wall respectively, and the error range is 2.4%-8.5%, which verifies the certain reliability of the simulation. The peak value of secondary lining pressure is located at the arch foot, and the peak values of positive and negative bending moments are located at the top and arch foot respectively. Due to the sign reversal of bending moment at the arch foot, the arch foot is regarded as a dangerous node. The safety factor of secondary lining is higher than the critical value of safety factor, and the tensile safety factor of arch foot is close to the critical value. Due to the increase of load sharing ratio of secondary lining, the corresponding axial force and bending moment borne by secondary lining will increase, and the safety shows a downward trend.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-06-21
  • 最后修改日期:2025-09-17
  • 录用日期:2025-09-18
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码